I thought the audio quality was excellent on this study, but I'm afraid we differ a lot on our concepts of angels, but that's a good thing ,it makes me dig deeper . I just finished listening to the 3 studies , I wish I would of listened to them before the chat session.

I also disagree with your definition of lucifer. I agree that your Hebrew root word was correct , but it doesn't really apply to satan after his fall. It just doesn't fit in right, but I did learn something new from it , I never looked at the root word for lucifer before, it's like a witness that God did create him good, but satan corrupted himself. I checked on a few of the places it was used I'll have to make a study on it when I have more time, (it's used 165 times) it looks like it would be an interesting study in itself. For example in 1 Sam.21:13 it is the word mad, when David pretended to be " mad " when he went to Gath, but that was a pretty crazy thing for him to do anyway. I've never really understood why David went there to begin with when that's where Goliath was from.


Our differences on what angels are comes from this verse.

Rev 22:9 Then saith he unto me, See [thou do it] not: for I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren the prophets, and of them which keep the sayings of this book: worship God.